US6985996B1 - Method and apparatus for relocating RAID meta data - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for relocating RAID meta data Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US6985996B1 US6985996B1 US10/318,587 US31858702A US6985996B1 US 6985996 B1 US6985996 B1 US 6985996B1 US 31858702 A US31858702 A US 31858702A US 6985996 B1 US6985996 B1 US 6985996B1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- raid
- meta data
- disk
- implementation
- data
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime, expires
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 57
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 11
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005201 scrubbing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005056 compaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011112 process operation Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/07—Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
- G06F11/08—Error detection or correction by redundancy in data representation, e.g. by using checking codes
- G06F11/10—Adding special bits or symbols to the coded information, e.g. parity check, casting out 9's or 11's
- G06F11/1076—Parity data used in redundant arrays of independent storages, e.g. in RAID systems
- G06F11/1096—Parity calculation or recalculation after configuration or reconfiguration of the system
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/07—Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
- G06F11/16—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware
- G06F11/20—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements
- G06F11/2053—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements where persistent mass storage functionality or persistent mass storage control functionality is redundant
- G06F11/2056—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements where persistent mass storage functionality or persistent mass storage control functionality is redundant by mirroring
- G06F11/2071—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements where persistent mass storage functionality or persistent mass storage control functionality is redundant by mirroring using a plurality of controllers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2211/00—Indexing scheme relating to details of data-processing equipment not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00
- G06F2211/10—Indexing scheme relating to G06F11/10
- G06F2211/1002—Indexing scheme relating to G06F11/1076
- G06F2211/1083—Reserve area on a disk of a RAID system
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to methods and apparatus for allowing inter-operabiltity between computer systems and more particularly to provide the capability to move hard disks of a redundant array of inexpensive disks (RAID) between computers without losing any data and maintaining the properties of the members of the RAID.
- RAID redundant array of inexpensive disks
- RAID systems are commonly employed throughout computers today. Mirroring, striping, parity and hybrids of these implementations are prevalent in computers and provide for a high degree of data availability in the case of disk failure.
- the hard disks used for the various RAID systems contain meta data i.e., data that describes the structure configuration, attributes, etc. of the data stored on the disk.
- the meta data is important for the computer system or RAID controller to understand how the data is organized in the RAID system. If for some reason, the computer, with which the RAID system was in communication with, fails while the RAID system is intact, then the RAID system can be transferred to another computer in order to retrieve the data with the assistance of the meta data. Meta data can be stamped on the first few sectors of every disk, i.e., member of the RAID. Alternatively, the RAID meta data can be stored on non volatile memory of a RAID card or a system motherboard. However, the meta data stamped on the first few sectors suffers from the same shortcomings for meta data stored separately from the disks. That is, it is only possible to move the disks to a second computer if the hardware and software that interfaces with the RAID is manufactured by the same company. Otherwise, the second computer system will not recognize the disks or the data contained on the disks of the RAID.
- FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate the operations for migrating data from a first disk to a second disk to create a RAID mirroring system.
- Block diagram 100 of FIG. 1A displays disk 1 102 and disk 2 106 .
- Disk 1 102 contains data in region 103 that a user would like to implement as a RAID mirroring system.
- the data from disk 1 of region 103 is copied to disk 2 in region 107 .
- the data is shifted by at least “n” sectors on disk 2 106 in order to leave region 108 empty on disk 2 so that the meta data can be stamped into the first “n” sectors (or more) of disk 2 .
- the data in at least the last “n” sectors 104 of disk 1 102 will be lost if disk 1 and disk 2 106 are the same size.
- FIG. 1B displays disk 2 106 being stamped with meta data in the first “n” sectors 114 of disk 2 106 .
- the contents of disk 2 106 are then copied down to disk 1 102 .
- disk 1 102 contains the meta data in the first “n” sectors 118 and disk 1 102 and disk 2 106 are duplicate images capable of being implemented in a RAID.
- the migration process becomes more cumbersome for a RAID implementation using striping, as an extra step is needed to temporarily store the stripe over three or four disks.
- the present invention fills these needs by providing a method and apparatus enabling interoperability of a RAID implementation between different host systems. Additionally, the compact meta data, which enables interoperability of the RAID implementation, allows for a simplified migration process. It should be appreciated that the present invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, or a device. Several inventive embodiments of the present invention are described below.
- a method for creating a RAID mirroring system from a first disk containing a user's data begins with identifying meta data for the first disk.
- the meta data is introduced to a last sector of the first disk.
- the user's data and the meta data of the first disk are copied to a second disk, where the meta data is copied to a last sector of the second disk.
- the first disk and the second disk are arranged as a RAID mirroring system.
- a method for enabling interoperability of a RAID implementation between different host systems begins with meta data being identified for a RAID implementation. Next, the meta data of the RAID implementation is stored. Then, the RAID implementation is transferred from a first host system to a second host system. Next, the meta data for each disk of the RAID implementation is accessed in response to the start-up of the second host system.
- a method for enabling meta data of a RAID implementation to be recognized by different host systems begins with identifying meta data for a RAID implementation. Then, the meta data of the RAID implementation is stored in a non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM) if access to the NVRAM is available. If access to the NVRAM is not available, then the meta data for the RAID implementation is stored in a last sector of each disk of the RAID implementation. Next, the RAID implementation is transferred from a first host system to a second host system. Then, the meta data is accessed in the NVRAM or the last sector of each disk of the RAID implementation in response to the start-up of the second host system. Next, it is determined if the meta data requires modification to communicate with the second host system.
- NVRAM non-volatile random access memory
- a computer readable media having program instructions for enabling interoperability of a RAID implementation between different host systems.
- the computer readable media includes program instructions for identifying meta data for a RAID implementation and program instructions for storing the meta data of the RAID implementation.
- Program instructions for transferring the RAID implementation from a first host system to a second host system are included.
- Program instructions for accessing the meta data for each disk of the RAID implementation in response to the start-up of the second host system are also included.
- a RAID system in another embodiment, includes at least two disks arranged as a RAID implementation.
- Meta data configured to fit on a sector of a storage medium is included.
- the meta data defines a RAID configuration, and the meta data is configured to be accessible and modifiable in order for the RAID system to be interoperable with different host systems.
- FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram illustrating a first operation for migrating data from a first disk to a second disk to create a RAID mirroring system.
- FIG. 1B is a schematic diagram illustrating a second operation for migrating data from a first disk to a second disk to create a RAID mirroring system.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of two disks for a RAID mirroring system created from a single disk containing a user's data in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram of an interoperable RAID system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 3B is another schematic diagram of an interoperable RAID system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 3C is a schematic diagram of an interoperable RAID system configured as an external RAID box in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 4 is a diagram of a disk in an interoperable RAID system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the method operations for creating a RAID mirroring system from a disk containing a user's data in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart of the method operations for enabling interoperability of a RAID implementation between different host systems in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- An invention is described for an apparatus and method for providing a fixed table structure for each hard disk of a redundant array of inexpensive disks (RAID) system such that the fixed table structure becomes a component of the system.
- RAID redundant array of inexpensive disks
- the RAID system becomes interoperable and the migration process for implementing a RAID mirroring system from a single disk is simplified. It will be obvious, however, to one skilled in the art, that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
- the embodiments of the present invention include a method of creating a RAID mirroring system from a single disk containing data.
- the meta data refers to a fixed table structure containing data on the RAID configuration.
- the compacted RAID meta data is a maximum of 180 bytes long, in one embodiment.
- the meta data consists of three 32 bit words. Thus, the meta data takes up only one sector.
- the fixed table structure i.e., the meta data
- the meta data can be associated with each hard disk such that if a complete RAID implementation is moved from one system to another system, the properties are fully maintained and there is no loss of data. It should be appreciated that the properties of a RAID implementation that communicates to the host through a host bus adapter card would also be maintained by the embodiments discussed herein. Furthermore, this table structure can be placed so that it becomes a component of the RAID and allows different systems to read the configuration code for the RAID during the boot-up process.
- the meta data defines the data contained in the drives of the RAID. More particularly, the meta data includes configuration data for each of the drives, such as the type of RAID implementation, the members of the RAID, device identification, capacity, etc.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of two disks for a RAID mirroring system created from a single disk containing a user's data in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- Disk 1 120 contains a user's data in region 122 of disk 1 . It should be appreciated that disk 1 120 is any suitable storage media, such as the hard drive in a personal computer.
- the last sector 124 of disk 120 contains meta data which defines the configuration of the RAID implementation, e.g., a RAID mirroring system. In one embodiment, the meta data is configured to fit in one sector of disk 1 120 or any other disk.
- Disk 2 126 is a copy of disk 1 120 . The user's data from region 122 of disk 1 120 is copied to region 128 of disk 2 126 .
- meta data from the last sector 124 of disk 1 120 is copied to the last sector 130 of disk 2 126 . It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the meta data will define where the data from region 122 of disk 1 120 is copied to in region 128 of disk 2 among other configuration parameters such as the type of RAID, the members, capacity and device identification.
- disk 1 can contain any amount of a user's data as the meta data is compacted to fit in one sector.
- the meta data is compacted to fit in one sector by eliminating unnecessary information which is unrecognizable to components made by vendors different than the vendors of the disks for the RAID system.
- the extraneous data, i.e., data eliminated from the compact meta data is stored in a file in one embodiment of the invention.
- Table 1 provides the structure and definition of the compact meta data in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. It should be appreciated that the table structure provided in Table 1 is exemplary and not meant to be limiting.
- the stripe size is 16 blocks which is 8 KB.
- a Value of 0 means 16 i.e. 2 to power 16 which is 65536 blocks.
- RaidType 4 7–4 RAID 0, 1, 3, 4, 5 set as 0, 1, 3, 4, 5. The dual levels would be set as 9, 11, 12 and 13 respectively for RAID 10, 30, 40, and 50. VendorUniqueFlags 4 3–0 Implementers may define their own flags here.
- WORD#2 COUNTERS RaidStructUpdateCount 16 31–16 Each time the meta data on this member is updated, this number is incremented.
- Table 1 includes 3–32 bit words containing the compact meta data, i.e., the RAID configuration.
- the fields for each word as well as the number of bits, bit positions each word occupies and a brief description of the function of the field are provided.
- Word #1 is a RAID unique identification (RAID UID) assigned to each member of a RAID.
- the fields of Word #1 indicate a quality and a state of the RAID.
- the unique identification (UID) field is a randomly generated number that differentiates RAIDs in an organization from one another. In one embodiment, the randomly generated number involves using a time of day.
- the RAIDState indicates if the RAID is healthy or if it is degraded, i.e., faulty or missing disks.
- the missing data may be able to be recreated from the remaining configuration data contained by the compact meta data.
- the RAIDAction defines a RAID activity. Five activity levels are provided in TABLE 1, while three additional levels can be added if needed. The five activities include None, Initializing, Verifying, Scrubbing and Rebuilding. RAIDStripe is only applicable for a RAID configuration that includes striping, such as RAID 5 and RAID 0.
- RAIDType refers to the well known RAID levels such as disk striping, mirroring, parity and hybrids of each.
- the VendorUnique field allows a vendor to define proprietary data here in addition to their own flags.
- Word #2 of Table 1 is a 32 bit word where the fields of Word #2 include counters further indicating the configuration of the RAID.
- the RAIDStructUpdateCount is incremented each time the meta data for a member of the RAID is updated.
- the update version is helpful where there is a failure of a member. With the version number of the meta data, it can be verified if the meta data for the failed member is the most recent version, which may account for the failure of the RAID member.
- the RAIDMemberCount field indicates the number of members of the RAID while the RAIDMemberIndex field indicates the position occupied by this particular member of the RAID.
- Word #3 is a 32 bit word in which a field functions as a tracking check point.
- the table structure will need to be replicated for as many times as the disk is segmented. Additionally, two 32 bit words defining the start and the end of the segments would be required.
- the compact meta data defined in Table 1 allows for the placement of the data into one data sector which enables the meta data to be easily stored in a number of location as described below.
- the compact meta data i.e., fixed table structure is configured so that the agencies of different computer systems can read the meta data, and thereby determine the configuration of the RAID. As a result the RAID becomes interoperable among differing computer systems because the compact meta data is accessible.
- the compact meta data is modifiable through a mode select command, thereby enhancing the interoperability of a RAID system associated with the meta data.
- FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram of an interoperable RAID system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- Mother board 132 includes CPU 133 and random access memory (RAM) 134 in communication with input/output processor (IOP) 136 and small computer system interface (SCSI) chip 138 through peripheral component interconnect (PCI) bus 140 .
- SCSI chip 138 is in communication with a RAID implementation.
- Hard drives 142 and 148 are included in the RAID implementation.
- Hard drive 142 includes disk 146 a and interface chip 144 a .
- interface chip 144 a contains non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM). A portion of the NVRAM is available to all software which communicates with interface chip 144 a .
- NVRAM non-volatile random access memory
- the size of the NVRAM available as shared information space for disk 146 is about 1 sector (about 512 bytes). It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the NVRAM also contains other configuration data such as how many heads the drive has. Since the meta data has been compacted to fit in one sector as mentioned above, the meta data for disk 146 a can be input into the shared information space of the NVRAM.
- hard drive 148 includes disk 146 b and interface chip 144 b .
- Interface chip 144 b contains NVRAM similar to interface chip 144 a .
- the meta data corresponding to disk 146 b is placed in the NVRAM of interface chip 144 b .
- the meta data is a maximum of 180 bits in one embodiment, therefore, the meta data can fit in one sector.
- FIG. 3A shows two hard drives making up the RAID implementation, any number of hard drives can be arranged in the RAID implementation.
- the RAID system can be arranged as a mirrored RAID, a striped RAID, parity RAID, hybrid RAID, etc.
- the RAID system becomes interoperable among different systems. That is, the RAID system can be disconnected from motherboard 132 and transferred to another system. The RAID system will be recognized by the other system it is transferred to because the configuration code for the RAID implementation is accessible by the agencies necessary to enable recognition.
- the RAID system of FIG. 3A can either be a hardware implementation using a RAID controller or a software implementation such as host based RAID.
- Modification of the data in the fixed table structure in the NVRAM 144 a and 144 b for the embodiment of FIG. 3A is accomplished through a SCSI command.
- a mode select command i.e., a SCSI command
- the mode select command is adapted to modify the configuration code of the RAID, i.e., the meta data.
- the existing mode select command can modify features such as when to perform caching, what speed to operate at, etc.
- the mode select command can modify compact RAID meta data.
- the new hardware and software of the system that the RAID implementation is transferred may be different. However, the same mode select command will read the compact RAID meta data.
- FIG. 3B is another schematic diagram of an interoperable RAID system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- the RAID implementation includes host bus adapter card 135 in communication with PCI bus 140 and hard drives 142 and 148 .
- Host bus adapter card 135 includes IOP chip 136 , SCSI chip 138 and NVRAM 137 . Similar to the NVRAM 144 a and 144 b on each hard drive of FIG. 3A , a portion of NVRAM 137 of host bus adapter card 135 is available to all software which communicates with the host bus adapter.
- the size of NVRAM 137 available as shared information space is about 1 sector (about 512 bytes).
- host bus adapter card 135 is considered part of the RAID implementation as it contains the configuration data of the RAID. Therefore, host bus adapter card 135 is transferable with hard drives 142 and 148 . Similar to FIG. 3A , the RAID implementation any number of drives in any RAID configuration, i.e., mirroring, striping, parity, etc. Additionally, a mode select command may be used to modify the meta data stored in NVRAM 137 .
- FIG. 3C is a schematic diagram of an interoperable RAID system configured as an external RAID box in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- motherboard 132 a such as the motherboard of FIG. 3A , is in communication with external RAID box 143 through SCSI cable 145 .
- Motherboard 132 a includes CPU 133 a , RAM 134 a , IOP 136 a , and SCSI controller 138 a in communication with each other through a bus.
- RAID box 143 includes RAID box controller 132 b .
- RAID box controller 132 b includes CPU 133 b , RAM 134 b , IOP 136 b and SCSI controller 138 b.
- FIG. 4 is a diagram of a disk in an interoperable RAID system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- the meta data can be stored in the last sector of the disk as mentioned with respect to FIG. 2 .
- the first sector 152 of disk 150 i.e., sector 0
- the partition table indicates how much of disk 150 is being used by each operating system. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the architectural definition allows only 4 operating systems per disk. Thus, at starting point 0 , information on the use of disk 150 by different operating systems resides.
- the pointer acts as a safety gate for the configuration data in last sector 154 of disk 150 .
- the RAID system is configured to be interoperable similar to the embodiment described with respect to FIGS. 3A and 3B . That is to say, the RAID system can be transferred between computer systems made by different vendors. More importantly, the meta data for the RAID system is maintained and is accessible by each computer system that the RAID system, i.e., the disks of the RAID system, is transferred to.
- FIGS. 3A , 3 B, 3 C and 4 can be combined in order to determine the optimum location to store the meta data.
- the shared information space on the NVRAM of FIGS. 3A and 3B is open to all software and may be consumed by another application.
- software code can check if NVRAM 137 of host bus adapter 135 of FIG. 3B has enough capacity for the meta data when setting up the RAID. If there is enough capacity for the meta data, then the meta data will be input to the NVRAM 137 as discussed with respect to FIG. 3B . If there is not a host bus adapter card 135 or NVRAM 137 of FIG.
- the meta data will be input to NVRAM 144 a and 144 b of each hard drive of the RAID as discussed with respect to FIG. 3A . If there is not enough capacity for the meta data because other software has previously accessed the NVRAM 144 a and 144 b of FIG. 3A , then the meta data is placed in the last sector of each disk 150 as discussed with respect to FIG. 4 . In each instance the compact meta data is stored and configured so it is accessible by the respective agencies of the computer system to which the RAID is transferred to. Therefore, the computer system can recognize and communicate with the transferred RAID.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the method operations for creating a RAID mirroring system from a disk containing a user's data in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- the method initiates with operation 156 where the meta data for the first disk is identified.
- the meta data is compacted to a maximum of 180 bytes and is configured to be compatible with systems from different vendors.
- the meta data is a fixed table structure for each hard disk.
- One suitable fixed table structure is represented by Table 1 above.
- the method advances to operation 158 where the meta data is introduced to the last sector of the first disk. That is, the fixed table structure is written to the last sector of the first disk.
- the method then proceeds to operation 160 where the user's data and the meta data are copied to a second disk.
- a user wishing to create a RAID mirroring implementation from a single hard drive on a personal computer will copy the data on the hard drive to a second disk. Additionally, the meta data copied to the last sector of the first disk in operation 158 is also copied to the last sector of the second disk. Upon completion of operation 160 , the first disk and the second disk are arranged as a RAID mirroring system.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart of the method operations for enabling interoperability of a RAID implementation between different host systems in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- the flowchart begins with operation 162 where the meta data for the RAID implementation is identified.
- the meta data is a compacted fixed table structure associated with each disk, such as the table structure defined in Table 1 above.
- the method then moves to operation 164 where a location for storing the meta data is determined.
- the meta data is stored in non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM).
- NVRAM can reside on an interface chip in communication with each disk of the RAID as discussed with reference to FIG. 3A . That is, each disk of the RAID is associated with one interface chip.
- the NVRAM may reside on a host bus adapter for the RAID as discussed with reference to FIG. 3B .
- the meta data on the last sector of each disk of the RAID as discussed with reference to FIG. 4 .
- code can be executed to determine the storage location for the meta data as described above with reference to FIGS. 3A , 3 B, 3 C and 4 .
- the method then advances to operation 166 where the meta data is stored.
- the data is stored in one of the locations discussed with respect to operation 164 .
- the method proceeds to operation 168 where the RAID implementation is transferred from a first host system to a second host system. For example, the RAID implementation is moved from a personal computer manufactured by a first vendor to a personal computer manufactured by a second vendor.
- the method of FIG. 6 then advances to operation 170 where the meta data for the RAID implementation is accessed in response to the start-up of the second host system.
- the agencies required to look at the fixed table structure such as the system basic input output system (BIOS), a device driver of the OS and RAID management software access the fixed table structure so that the second host system is able to communicate with the transferred RAID implementation.
- a mode select command is issued from a SCSI controller to modify the RAID configuration.
- a driver may be added or removed by the mode select command in order for the second host system to recognize the transferred RAID implementation.
- the method then proceeds to operation 172 where the second host system recognizes the RAID implementation.
- the RAID implementation is fully functional with the second host system due to the compaction of the meta data in a format that allows for interoperability of the RAID implementation between different systems.
- the invention may employ various computer-implemented operations involving data stored in computer systems. These operations are those requiring physical manipulation of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. Further, the manipulations performed are often referred to in terms, such as producing, identifying, determining, or comparing.
- the invention also relates to a device or an apparatus for performing these operations.
- the apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may be a general purpose computer selectively activated or configured by a computer program stored in the computer.
- various general purpose machines may be used with computer programs written in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may be more convenient to construct a more specialized apparatus to perform the required operations.
- the invention can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium.
- the computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data which can be thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include hard drives, network attached storage (NAS), read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, magnetic tapes, and other optical and non-optical data storage devices.
- the computer readable medium can also be distributed over a network coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
Description
TABLE 1 | |||
Bits | |||
Posi- | |||
Field | Bits | tions | |
Word# |
1 = RaidUID |
UID | 16 | 31–16 | Randomly generated number. |
This is only to differentiate | |||
the RAIDs in an organization | |||
from one another so disks do | |||
not get mixed up. Allows up | |||
to 65535 unique RAIDs to be | |||
present in an organization. | |||
|
1 | 15 | 0 means healthy. If it is 1, |
expect some members to be | |||
absent or faulty. | |||
RaidAction | 3 | 14–12 | Eight definitions are possible |
using these three bits which | |||
will tell if there is a RAID | |||
activity going on such as | |||
Nothing (0), Initializing(1), | |||
Verifying(2), Scrubbing(3), | |||
Rebuilding(4). | |||
RaidStripe | 4 | 11–8 | If striped, it tells the size of |
stripe by finding the power of | |||
two. E.g. if this is set as 0100 | |||
means FOUR, the stripe size | |||
is 16 blocks which is 8 KB. A | |||
Value of 0 means 16 i.e. 2 to | |||
power 16 which is 65536 | |||
blocks. | |||
RaidType | 4 | 7–4 | |
3, 4, 5. The dual levels would | |||
be set as 9, 11, 12 and 13 | |||
respectively for RAID 10, | |||
30, 40, and 50. | |||
VendorUniqueFlags | 4 | 3–0 | Implementers may define their |
own flags here. |
|
RaidStructUpdateCount | 16 | 31–16 | Each time the meta data on |
this member is updated, this | |||
number is incremented. | |||
RaidMemberCount | 8 | 15–8 | Number of members of this |
RAID. Maximum of 256 | |||
members is denoted by a zero. | |||
RaidMemberIndex | 8 | 7–0 | The member position being |
occupied | |||
Word#3 = Check Point | |||
RaidActionLBA | 32 | 31–0 | Indicates up to what Logical |
Block Address (LBA) the | |||
RaidAction has been | |||
completed. | |||
Word#4 = VendorUnique | Unique to each vendor | ||
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/318,587 US6985996B1 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2002-12-13 | Method and apparatus for relocating RAID meta data |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/318,587 US6985996B1 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2002-12-13 | Method and apparatus for relocating RAID meta data |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US6985996B1 true US6985996B1 (en) | 2006-01-10 |
Family
ID=35517939
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/318,587 Expired - Lifetime US6985996B1 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2002-12-13 | Method and apparatus for relocating RAID meta data |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6985996B1 (en) |
Cited By (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050132133A1 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2005-06-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for equalizing usage of storage media |
US20050289531A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | Device interoperability tool set and method for processing interoperability application specifications into interoperable application packages |
US20060007565A1 (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2006-01-12 | Akihiro Eto | Lens barrel and photographing apparatus |
US20060041782A1 (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2006-02-23 | Dell Products L.P. | System and method for recovering from a drive failure in a storage array |
US20060136777A1 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Unit, method and program for detecting imprecise data |
US20070168754A1 (en) * | 2005-12-19 | 2007-07-19 | Xiv Ltd. | Method and apparatus for ensuring writing integrity in mass storage systems |
US20080201630A1 (en) * | 2007-02-21 | 2008-08-21 | Fujitsu Limited | Storage controlling device and storage controlling method |
US20080313496A1 (en) * | 2007-06-12 | 2008-12-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Gracefully degradable versioned storage systems |
US20110182119A1 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2011-07-28 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for determining a read voltage threshold for solid-state storage media |
WO2011130185A2 (en) * | 2010-04-11 | 2011-10-20 | Alex Grossman | Systems and methods for raid metadata storage |
US20120203951A1 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2012-08-09 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for determining a configuration parameter for solid-state storage media |
US20120278528A1 (en) * | 2011-04-28 | 2012-11-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Iimplementing storage adapter with enhanced flash backed dram management |
US8527841B2 (en) | 2009-03-13 | 2013-09-03 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for using multi-level cell solid-state storage as reduced-level cell solid-state storage |
US8661184B2 (en) | 2010-01-27 | 2014-02-25 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Managing non-volatile media |
US8854882B2 (en) | 2010-01-27 | 2014-10-07 | Intelligent Intellectual Property Holdings 2 Llc | Configuring storage cells |
US9245653B2 (en) | 2010-03-15 | 2016-01-26 | Intelligent Intellectual Property Holdings 2 Llc | Reduced level cell mode for non-volatile memory |
US20170039004A1 (en) * | 2010-08-06 | 2017-02-09 | Dhk Storage, Llc | Raid devices, systems, and methods |
CN107870731A (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2018-04-03 | 伊姆西Ip控股有限责任公司 | The management method and electronic equipment of redundant array of independent disks system |
US20190129643A1 (en) * | 2017-10-27 | 2019-05-02 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Method, system and computer program product for managing storage sysyem |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6289356B1 (en) * | 1993-06-03 | 2001-09-11 | Network Appliance, Inc. | Write anywhere file-system layout |
US6427212B1 (en) * | 1998-11-13 | 2002-07-30 | Tricord Systems, Inc. | Data fault tolerance software apparatus and method |
US6467023B1 (en) * | 1999-03-23 | 2002-10-15 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Method for logical unit creation with immediate availability in a raid storage environment |
US6502174B1 (en) * | 1999-03-03 | 2002-12-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for managing meta data |
US6643654B1 (en) * | 2001-06-25 | 2003-11-04 | Network Appliance, Inc. | System and method for representing named data streams within an on-disk structure of a file system |
US6675176B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2004-01-06 | Fujitsu Limited | File management system |
US6738863B2 (en) * | 2000-11-18 | 2004-05-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for rebuilding meta-data in a data storage system and a data storage system |
US6766430B2 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2004-07-20 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Data reallocation among storage systems |
US6779094B2 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2004-08-17 | Storage Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for instant copy of data by writing new data to an additional physical storage area |
US6816957B1 (en) * | 1999-10-26 | 2004-11-09 | Storage Technology Corporation | Management of virtual tape volumes using data page atomic units |
-
2002
- 2002-12-13 US US10/318,587 patent/US6985996B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6289356B1 (en) * | 1993-06-03 | 2001-09-11 | Network Appliance, Inc. | Write anywhere file-system layout |
US6721764B2 (en) * | 1993-06-03 | 2004-04-13 | Network Appliance, Inc. | Copy on write file system consistency and block usage |
US6675176B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2004-01-06 | Fujitsu Limited | File management system |
US6427212B1 (en) * | 1998-11-13 | 2002-07-30 | Tricord Systems, Inc. | Data fault tolerance software apparatus and method |
US6502174B1 (en) * | 1999-03-03 | 2002-12-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for managing meta data |
US6467023B1 (en) * | 1999-03-23 | 2002-10-15 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Method for logical unit creation with immediate availability in a raid storage environment |
US6816957B1 (en) * | 1999-10-26 | 2004-11-09 | Storage Technology Corporation | Management of virtual tape volumes using data page atomic units |
US6779094B2 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2004-08-17 | Storage Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for instant copy of data by writing new data to an additional physical storage area |
US6766430B2 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2004-07-20 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Data reallocation among storage systems |
US6738863B2 (en) * | 2000-11-18 | 2004-05-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for rebuilding meta-data in a data storage system and a data storage system |
US6643654B1 (en) * | 2001-06-25 | 2003-11-04 | Network Appliance, Inc. | System and method for representing named data streams within an on-disk structure of a file system |
Cited By (62)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050132133A1 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2005-06-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for equalizing usage of storage media |
US8244974B2 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2012-08-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for equalizing usage of storage media |
US7703073B2 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2010-04-20 | Covia Labs, Inc. | Device interoperability format rule set and method for assembling interoperability application package |
US20050289508A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | Method and system for customized programmatic dynamic creation of interoperability content |
US20050289266A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | Method and system for interoperable content player device engine |
US20050289510A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | Method and system for interoperable device enabling hardware abstraction layer modification and engine porting |
US7712111B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2010-05-04 | Covia Labs, Inc. | Method and system for linear tasking among a plurality of processing units |
US20050289383A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | System and method for interoperability application driven error management and recovery among intermittently coupled interoperable electronic devices |
US20050289558A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | Device interoperability runtime establishing event serialization and synchronization amongst a plurality of separate processing units and method for coordinating control data and operations |
US20050289527A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | Device interoperability format rule set and method for assembling interoperability application package |
US20050289264A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | Device and method for interoperability instruction set |
US20050289559A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | Method and system for vertical layering between levels in a processing unit facilitating direct event-structures and event-queues level-to-level communication without translation |
US20060005205A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2006-01-05 | Daniel Illowsky | Device interoperability framework and method for building interoperability applications for interoperable team of devices |
US20060005193A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2006-01-05 | Daniel Illowsky | Method system and data structure for content renditioning adaptation and interoperability segmentation model |
US10673942B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2020-06-02 | David E. Kahn | System method and model for social synchronization interoperability among intermittently connected interoperating devices |
US20060015936A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2006-01-19 | Daniel Illowsky | System method and model for social security interoperability among intermittently connected interoperating devices |
US20060015937A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2006-01-19 | Daniel Illowsky | System method and model for maintaining device integrity and security among intermittently connected interoperating devices |
US20060020912A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2006-01-26 | Daniel Illowsky | Method and system for specifying generating and forming intelligent teams of interoperable devices |
US20050289531A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | Device interoperability tool set and method for processing interoperability application specifications into interoperable application packages |
US20050289265A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | System method and model for social synchronization interoperability among intermittently connected interoperating devices |
US20060206882A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2006-09-14 | Daniel Illowsky | Method and system for linear tasking among a plurality of processing units |
US7831752B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2010-11-09 | Covia Labs, Inc. | Method and device for interoperability in heterogeneous device environment |
US7788663B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2010-08-31 | Covia Labs, Inc. | Method and system for device recruitment interoperability and assembling unified interoperating device constellation |
US7761863B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2010-07-20 | Covia Labs, Inc. | Method system and data structure for content renditioning adaptation and interoperability segmentation model |
US7747980B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2010-06-29 | Covia Labs, Inc. | Method and system for specifying device interoperability source specifying renditions data and code for interoperable device team |
US20090113088A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2009-04-30 | Dartdevices Corporation | Method and device for interoperability in heterogeneous device environment |
US7571346B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2009-08-04 | Dartdevices Interop Corporation | System and method for interoperability application driven error management and recovery among intermittently coupled interoperable electronic devices |
US7596227B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2009-09-29 | Dartdevices Interop Corporation | System method and model for maintaining device integrity and security among intermittently connected interoperating devices |
US7600252B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2009-10-06 | Dartdevices Interop Corporation | System method and model for social security interoperability among intermittently connected interoperating devices |
US7613881B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2009-11-03 | Dartdevices Interop Corporation | Method and system for configuring and using virtual pointers to access one or more independent address spaces |
US20050289509A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Daniel Illowsky | Method and system for specifying device interoperability source specifying renditions data and code for interoperable device team |
US7730482B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2010-06-01 | Covia Labs, Inc. | Method and system for customized programmatic dynamic creation of interoperability content |
US20060007565A1 (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2006-01-12 | Akihiro Eto | Lens barrel and photographing apparatus |
US20060041782A1 (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2006-02-23 | Dell Products L.P. | System and method for recovering from a drive failure in a storage array |
US7363532B2 (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2008-04-22 | Dell Products L.P. | System and method for recovering from a drive failure in a storage array |
US20060136777A1 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Unit, method and program for detecting imprecise data |
US7689869B2 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2010-03-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Unit, method and program for detecting imprecise data |
US20070168754A1 (en) * | 2005-12-19 | 2007-07-19 | Xiv Ltd. | Method and apparatus for ensuring writing integrity in mass storage systems |
US20080201630A1 (en) * | 2007-02-21 | 2008-08-21 | Fujitsu Limited | Storage controlling device and storage controlling method |
US8489976B2 (en) * | 2007-02-21 | 2013-07-16 | Fujitsu Limited | Storage controlling device and storage controlling method |
US20080313496A1 (en) * | 2007-06-12 | 2008-12-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Gracefully degradable versioned storage systems |
US7849354B2 (en) * | 2007-06-12 | 2010-12-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Gracefully degradable versioned storage systems |
US8527841B2 (en) | 2009-03-13 | 2013-09-03 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for using multi-level cell solid-state storage as reduced-level cell solid-state storage |
US20110182119A1 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2011-07-28 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for determining a read voltage threshold for solid-state storage media |
US8854882B2 (en) | 2010-01-27 | 2014-10-07 | Intelligent Intellectual Property Holdings 2 Llc | Configuring storage cells |
US20120203951A1 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2012-08-09 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for determining a configuration parameter for solid-state storage media |
US8873286B2 (en) | 2010-01-27 | 2014-10-28 | Intelligent Intellectual Property Holdings 2 Llc | Managing non-volatile media |
US8661184B2 (en) | 2010-01-27 | 2014-02-25 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Managing non-volatile media |
US8315092B2 (en) | 2010-01-27 | 2012-11-20 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for determining a read voltage threshold for solid-state storage media |
US8380915B2 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2013-02-19 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for managing solid-state storage media |
US9245653B2 (en) | 2010-03-15 | 2016-01-26 | Intelligent Intellectual Property Holdings 2 Llc | Reduced level cell mode for non-volatile memory |
WO2011130185A2 (en) * | 2010-04-11 | 2011-10-20 | Alex Grossman | Systems and methods for raid metadata storage |
WO2011130185A3 (en) * | 2010-04-11 | 2012-03-08 | Alex Grossman | Systems and methods for raid metadata storage |
US20170039004A1 (en) * | 2010-08-06 | 2017-02-09 | Dhk Storage, Llc | Raid devices, systems, and methods |
US9760312B2 (en) * | 2010-08-06 | 2017-09-12 | Dhk Storage, Llc | RAID devices, systems, and methods |
US20120278528A1 (en) * | 2011-04-28 | 2012-11-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Iimplementing storage adapter with enhanced flash backed dram management |
CN107870731A (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2018-04-03 | 伊姆西Ip控股有限责任公司 | The management method and electronic equipment of redundant array of independent disks system |
US10649892B2 (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2020-05-12 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Operating a raw mirror within a RAID system |
CN107870731B (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2021-07-27 | 伊姆西Ip控股有限责任公司 | Management method of Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) system and electronic equipment |
US11403215B2 (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2022-08-02 | EMC IP Holding Company, LLP | Using a raw mirror to initialize a storage system |
US20190129643A1 (en) * | 2017-10-27 | 2019-05-02 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Method, system and computer program product for managing storage sysyem |
US10824361B2 (en) * | 2017-10-27 | 2020-11-03 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Changing data reliability type within a storage system |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6985996B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for relocating RAID meta data | |
US7613889B2 (en) | System, method, and program for determining if write data overlaps source data within a data migration scheme | |
US7383290B2 (en) | Transaction processing systems and methods utilizing non-disk persistent memory | |
US7870356B1 (en) | Creation of snapshot copies using a sparse file for keeping a record of changed blocks | |
JP5603997B2 (en) | Storage apparatus and data control method | |
US20090132621A1 (en) | Selecting storage location for file storage based on storage longevity and speed | |
US7222135B2 (en) | Method, system, and program for managing data migration | |
US6832290B2 (en) | Method, system, program, and data structures for maintaining metadata in a storage system | |
JP2007513435A (en) | Method, system, and program for managing data organization | |
US20060155944A1 (en) | System and method for data migration and shredding | |
US7353240B1 (en) | Method and storage system that enable sharing files among multiple servers | |
WO2002056179A1 (en) | Method for regenerating partition using virtual drive, data processor and data storage device | |
US7197599B2 (en) | Method, system, and program for managing data updates | |
JP3407628B2 (en) | Computer system | |
US8140886B2 (en) | Apparatus, system, and method for virtual storage access method volume data set recovery | |
US6453396B1 (en) | System, method and computer program product for hardware assisted backup for a computer mass storage system | |
US10705853B2 (en) | Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for boot acceleration in a data storage system by consolidating client-specific boot data in a consolidated boot volume | |
CN109313593B (en) | Storage system | |
US20210181977A1 (en) | Optimizing atomic writes to a storage device | |
US7188303B2 (en) | Method, system, and program for generating parity data | |
US9665581B1 (en) | Managing file system checking | |
JP4390618B2 (en) | Database reorganization program, database reorganization method, and database reorganization apparatus | |
US7590780B2 (en) | Method and computer program product to migrate legacy data to a RAID array while contemporaneously providing user access to legacy data | |
JP3614886B2 (en) | File system | |
US7430635B2 (en) | Methods and structure for improved import/export of RAID level 6 volumes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ADAPTEC, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NAGSHAIN, MADHURESH;REEL/FRAME:013580/0030 Effective date: 20021212 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PMC-SIERRA, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ADAPTEC, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030899/0567 Effective date: 20100608 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., NORTH CAROLINA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNORS:PMC-SIERRA, INC.;PMC-SIERRA US, INC.;WINTEGRA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030947/0710 Effective date: 20130802 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PMC-SIERRA, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:037675/0129 Effective date: 20160115 Owner name: WINTEGRA, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:037675/0129 Effective date: 20160115 Owner name: PMC-SIERRA US, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:037675/0129 Effective date: 20160115 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., NEW YORK Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC. (F/K/A PMC-SIERRA, INC.);MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS (U.S.), INC. (F/K/A PMC-SIERRA US, INC.);REEL/FRAME:037689/0719 Effective date: 20160115 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.;REEL/FRAME:046251/0271 Effective date: 20180529 Owner name: MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS (U.S.), INC., CALIFORN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.;REEL/FRAME:046251/0271 Effective date: 20180529 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED;SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.;ATMEL CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:046426/0001 Effective date: 20180529 Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED;SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.;ATMEL CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:046426/0001 Effective date: 20180529 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT, CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED;SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.;ATMEL CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:047103/0206 Effective date: 20180914 Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES C Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED;SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.;ATMEL CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:047103/0206 Effective date: 20180914 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC.;SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.;ATMEL CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:053311/0305 Effective date: 20200327 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:053466/0011 Effective date: 20200529 Owner name: SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:053466/0011 Effective date: 20200529 Owner name: MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:053466/0011 Effective date: 20200529 Owner name: ATMEL CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:053466/0011 Effective date: 20200529 Owner name: MICROSEMI CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:053466/0011 Effective date: 20200529 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, MINNESOTA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC.;SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.;ATMEL CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:053468/0705 Effective date: 20200529 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, MINNESOTA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED;SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.;ATMEL CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:055671/0612 Effective date: 20201217 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT, MINNESOTA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED;SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.;ATMEL CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:057935/0474 Effective date: 20210528 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059333/0222 Effective date: 20220218 Owner name: MICROSEMI CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059333/0222 Effective date: 20220218 Owner name: ATMEL CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059333/0222 Effective date: 20220218 Owner name: SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059333/0222 Effective date: 20220218 Owner name: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059333/0222 Effective date: 20220218 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059358/0001 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: MICROSEMI CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059358/0001 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: ATMEL CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059358/0001 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059358/0001 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059358/0001 Effective date: 20220228 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059863/0400 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: MICROSEMI CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059863/0400 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: ATMEL CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059863/0400 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059863/0400 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059863/0400 Effective date: 20220228 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059363/0001 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: MICROSEMI CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059363/0001 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: ATMEL CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059363/0001 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059363/0001 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:059363/0001 Effective date: 20220228 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060894/0437 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: MICROSEMI CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060894/0437 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: ATMEL CORPORATION, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060894/0437 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060894/0437 Effective date: 20220228 Owner name: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ARIZONA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060894/0437 Effective date: 20220228 |