US6990070B1 - Method and apparatus for adjusting packet transmission volume from a source - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for adjusting packet transmission volume from a source Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US6990070B1 US6990070B1 US09/465,705 US46570599A US6990070B1 US 6990070 B1 US6990070 B1 US 6990070B1 US 46570599 A US46570599 A US 46570599A US 6990070 B1 US6990070 B1 US 6990070B1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- volume
- receiver
- volume value
- transmitter
- queue
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 title description 20
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 239000003607 modifier Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 13
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004043 responsiveness Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000008694 Humulus lupulus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003127 knee Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
- H04L47/19—Flow control; Congestion control at layers above the network layer
- H04L47/193—Flow control; Congestion control at layers above the network layer at the transport layer, e.g. TCP related
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
- H04L47/12—Avoiding congestion; Recovering from congestion
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
- H04L47/27—Evaluation or update of window size, e.g. using information derived from acknowledged [ACK] packets
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
- H04L47/29—Flow control; Congestion control using a combination of thresholds
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
- H04L47/30—Flow control; Congestion control in combination with information about buffer occupancy at either end or at transit nodes
Definitions
- packets of information are conveyed between a packet transmitter and a packet receiver.
- the transmitter may be any device that transmits data on the network and the receiver may be any device that receives data from the network.
- a receiver will send an acknowledgement signal to a transmitter of a packet to indicate that a packet has been received.
- data packets pass through intermediate elements on the network, for example routers, switches and gateways, which receive and queue data packets in queues for transmission on one or more communications channels or links. To avoid overloading any given channel, packet transmission on each channel must be managed and controlled.
- One technique for managing traffic on a network is to control the volume of packet transmissions from the transmitters.
- a transmitter will have a packet queue and the number of packets which are transmitted from the packet queue in a time interval is determined by a sliding window operating on the packet queue, which prevents the transmitter from transmitting a new packet onto the network whenever more than a specified number of transmitted packets remain unacknowledged by the corresponding receiver.
- a sliding window operating on the packet queue, which prevents the transmitter from transmitting a new packet onto the network whenever more than a specified number of transmitted packets remain unacknowledged by the corresponding receiver.
- This sliding window is usually called a “congestion window”.
- the size of the congestion window may be varied by the transmitter, depending on the capacity of the channel and the ability of the receiver to accept packets. These two factors may be measured implicitly by receiving acknowledgement signals at the transmitter. Generally, if acknowledgement signals are received at the transmitter, the volume of packets transmitted in a time interval is increased by increasing the size of the congestion window and if acknowledgement signals are not received or duplicate acknowledgement signals are received, i.e. packet loss is occurring, then the volume of packets transmitted in a time interval is decreased by decreasing the size of the congestion window.
- the receiver may also explicitly signal to the transmitter its ability to accept packets, for example, by signaling the maximum number of packets it can receive in a time interval.
- the transmitter will limit the size of its congestion window to avoid transmitting more packets greater than this maximum number.
- the receiver encodes this maximum number of packets as an “advertised window” in acknowledgement signals that it sends to the transmitter.
- the advertised window identifies to the transmitter a maximum value for its congestion window.
- TCP Transmission Control Protocol
- TCP makes no assumption as to how the network processes the data it sends, and performs its own data recovery and flow control.
- the TCP flow control mechanism is meant to reduce the packet volume when the network becomes congested, but TCP has no direct way of knowing when the network is congested. It can only indirectly detect congestion by keeping track of how many packets are lost. Packet loss indicates that some queue in the network might have overflowed. Every time TCP detects a packet loss, it reduces the transmission volume to alleviate the congestion that could have caused the packet loss.
- the window flow control mechanism of TCP may not be very effective because it relies on packet loss to signal congestion, instead of preventing congestion and buffer overflow.
- the basic problem is that TCP does not communicate directly with the network elements to determine optimal or assigned traffic volumes for respective elements. By the time the transmitter starts decreasing its volume because of packet loss, the network has already become overly congested. This problem exists because the design of TCP only considers the flow control needs of the receiver. It does not consider the flow control needs of intermediate hops in the network. Overflow in the network itself would be detected by the sender through timeouts or through acknowledgement arrival patterns. This presents problems in shared multi-hop networks, where the cause of packet loss is within intermediate elements in the network.
- the present invention addresses the above problem by providing a method and apparatus for adjusting the volume of data communicated between a transmitter and a receiver on a network, in a time interval.
- the method and apparatus involve producing a desired volume value in response to a receiver volume value specified by the receiver and a difference between a target departure volume and an estimate of arrival volume of data at a queue through which data passes from the transmitter to the receiver.
- the desired volume value is communicated to the transmitter, in response to an acknowledgement signal produced by the receiver.
- communicating the desired volume value to the transmitter is implemented by a signal modifier which produces a modified acknowledgement signal including the desired volume value, for communication to the transmitter.
- producing the desired volume value involves producing a network element volume value and taking the lesser of the receiver volume value extracted from the acknowledgement signal and the network element volume value as the desired volume value.
- computing the network element volume value includes time filtering an arrival volume value, for example as a weighted sum of present and past arrival volumes of data.
- a target departure volume is estimated as a function of a service volume of the queue and a target utilization factor of the queue.
- the network element volume value is then generated as a function of the difference between the data arrival volume at the queue and the target data departure volume at the queue.
- the queue size control mechanism includes a processor circuit for computing a scaling factor to diminish the network element volume value when the number of packets in the queue exceeds a threshold value, in order to decrease the transmission volumes of the transmitters to permit the queue to empty. This enhances the responsiveness and stability of the system and helps to quickly bring the system to desired operating conditions.
- Computer readable media as well as signals embodied in carrier waves including code segments for directing a processor or programmable device to perform the methods described herein are also provided.
- the volume of packets communicated by the transmitter continually changes, depending on both the status of the queue and the status of the receiver. Consequently, the volume of packets received at the queue is varied with each time interval.
- a queue controlled in such a manner is less likely to overflow or be under-utilized.
- the volume of packets which a transmitter communicates through the queue is varied, as required, to urge the packet arrival volume at the queue toward the packet departure volume at the queue.
- a queue having similar arrival and departure volumes in a given time interval tends toward stability about a desired queue occupancy level, and thus provides higher utilization, predictable delays, more certain buffer provisioning, and load-independent performance. These benefits may be achieved without the need to estimate a number of active network connections to the queue and without collecting or analyzing state information on individual connections.
- the methods proposed herein cause the transmitter to react to congestion (in the network and at the destination) before it occurs rather than when it is too late.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a network, including an intermediate network element, according to a first embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the network element shown in FIG. 1 ;
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart representing an algorithm executed by a processor at a detector shown in FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart representing an algorithm executed by a processor at a signal modifier shown in FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram representing the control process for computing a new network element volume of FIG. 1 .
- a network includes a first data transmitter 12 , a network element 14 and a first data receiver 16 .
- the transmitter 12 transmits data in a forward direction to the network element 14 which, in turn, transmits the data to the receiver 16 .
- the network element 14 transmits the data to the receiver 16 .
- the data transmitted by the transmitter 12 is transmitted as “forward” packets 18 which are communicated in a forward direction i.e. from the transmitter to the receiver 16 .
- packet is applied broadly, and contemplates any quantum of data, such as a block, a frame, a datagram, a cell, a word, a byte, or a bit, for example.
- a transmitter 12 -receiver 16 pair that exchanges packets via one or more network elements 14 is called a connection.
- the first transmitter 12 may be any device capable of transmitting data on a network, for example a telephone, a computer, a terminal, a video camera, an appliance with embedded logic or processor circuitry, or more generally any telecommunication or telephony device. Additionally, the transmitter 12 may include a receiver 23 for receiving data from the network 10 .
- the receiver 16 may be any device capable of receiving data on a network, for example a telephone, a computer, a terminal, a video receiver, an appliance with embedded logic or processor circuitry, or more generally any telecommunication or telephony device.
- the receiver 16 includes a receive buffer 24 for receiving packets 18 for use at the receiver 16 . Additionally, the receiver 16 has a transmitter 26 for transmitting data on the network 10 .
- an acknowledgement signal is a special reverse data packet transmitted in the reverse direction, i.e. from the receiver 16 to the transmitter 12 , and includes a specific pattern of bits that identifies it as an acknowledgement signal.
- This specific pattern of bits includes a representation of a maximum reception volume, which is the maximum volume of data the receiver 16 can receive in a time interval. This maximum volume is referred to as an advertised window of the receiver, or receiver volume value, and has a value of Wrec.
- an acknowledgement signal communicates the advertised window, or receiver volume, of the receiver 16 to the transmitter 12 .
- the transmitter 12 includes a transmission buffer 22 for queuing forward data packets 18 prior to transmission.
- the volume of forward data packets 18 that is transmitted from the transmission buffer 22 is determined by a siding window called a “congestion window” maintained by a processor at the transmitter and operating on the transmission buffer 22 .
- a congestion window maintained by a processor at the transmitter and operating on the transmission buffer 22 .
- the congestion window advances, permitting the transmitter 12 to transmit a new forward data packet 18 onto the network 10 .
- the size of the congestion window determines the volume of forward data packets 18 transmitted from the transmitter 12 .
- the transmitter 12 is programmed to adjust the size of its congestion window to be no greater than the size of the advertised window of the receiver 16 , or more particularly, to be no greater than the advertised window indicated in the acknowledgement signals it receives. If the transmitter receives an acknowledgement signal directly from the receiver, the receiver 16 can cause the transmitter 12 to increase or decrease its transmission volume according to the capability of the receiver 16 to receive data.
- the network element 14 includes an apparatus 38 for adjusting the volume of forward data packets communicated between the transmitter 12 and the receiver 16 .
- the apparatus 38 includes a detector 40 for detecting an acknowledgement signal produced by the receiver 16 in response to receipt of a forward data packet from the transmitter 12 .
- the apparatus 38 further includes a volume value generator 42 for computing a desired volume value, such as a new advertised window size, and a signal modifier 44 for producing a modified acknowledgement signal including the desired volume value for communication to the transmitter 12 .
- the apparatus 38 therefore effectively intercepts the acknowledgement signal produced by the receiver 16 and replaces the advertised window size in the acknowledgement signal with a new advertised window size.
- the apparatus then produces and transmits a new acknowledgement signal with the new advertised window size, to the transmitter 12 .
- the transmitter 12 responds as though the new acknowledgement signal were transmitted directly from the receiver 16 , and adjusts the size of its congestion window accordingly.
- the transmission volume of the transmitter 12 is adjusted according to network conditions, not just the ability of the receiver to receive data. This eases congestion at the network element 14 , thereby improving network performance. Also, changing network conditions as detected by the network element 14 play a role in changing the desired volume and therefore the actual transmission volume of the transmitter 12 is adjusted to take into account the changing capacity of the entire network connection from the transmitter 12 to the receiver 16 .
- a network element 14 in which the above apparatus may be incorporated could be any device connected to the network 10 to receive forward data packets 18 from a transmitter 12 to be forwarded to a receiver 16 and to receive acknowledgement signals from the receiver 16 to be forwarded to the transmitter 12 .
- the network element 14 is a store-and forward device, such as a router, switch, or gateway, for example.
- the network element 14 includes a forward input interface 28 in communication with a communications medium such as a data line, on which the transmitter 12 of FIG. 1 transmits forward data packets.
- the forward input interface 28 provides data packets to a queue interface 48 which administers packets into a queue 20 and which provides information to the apparatus 38 about the status of the queue 20 .
- Such information could include the total queue capacity Q, the queue occupancy q, the packet arrival volume ⁇ circumflex over (M) ⁇ , the target packet departure volume T, the actual service volume C, the target utilization factor ⁇ , the upper threshold Th, and the allocated buffer size B, for example.
- the total queue capacity Q is the total storage space available in the queue 20 for storing packets 18 .
- the queue occupancy q is the number of packets 18 that are currently stored in the queue 20 , and may be expressed as a number of packets 18 , an amount of memory, or a ratio of the total queue capacity Q.
- the packet arrival volume ⁇ circumflex over (M) ⁇ represents the number of packets 18 admitted to the queue 20 during a current sampling/control interval ⁇ t.
- the target packet departure volume T is the target number of packets 18 that can be dispatched from the queue 20 during the current sampling/control interval ⁇ t.
- the actual service volume C represents the maximum number of packets 18 that can be dispatched from the queue 20 during a sampling/control interval ⁇ t.
- the target utilization factor ⁇ represents a desired ratio of the target packet departure volume T and the actual service volume C.
- the upper threshold Th represents a queue occupancy q above which it is desirable to adjust the arrival volume ⁇ circumflex over (M) ⁇ or the target departure volume T to reduce the queue occupancy q.
- the allocated buffer size B is the size of an allocated buffer in the queue.
- Data packets stored in the queue are provided to a forward output interface 30 which is connected to a communications medium on which the network element 14 transmits forward data packets from the queue 20 to the receiver 16 .
- Signals received from the receiver 16 in particular, signals representing packets transmitted from the receiver 16 to the transmitter 12 are received from a communications medium by a reverse input interface 34 .
- the reverse input interface 34 converts the received signals into bytes representing a reverse data packet and provides the reverse data packet to the apparatus 38 .
- the reverse data packet is received at the detector 40 of the apparatus 38 .
- the functionality of the detector 40 is explained with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3 .
- the detector 40 receives the reverse data packet and stores it in a buffer 41 , as indicated by block 98 in FIG. 3 .
- the detector 40 then examines a type field of the reverse data packet to determine whether or not it is identified as an acknowledgement packet. If the reverse data packet is of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) type, the detector simply determines whether or not an “ACK” bit in the TCP packet header is set. Alternatively, acknowledgement information can be obtained from a specially encoded data packet. In any event, as indicated by block 100 in FIG. 3 , the detector determines whether or not the reverse data packet represents an acknowledgement from the receiver 16 shown in FIG. 1 .
- TCP Transmission Control Protocol
- the detector 40 can be implemented by discrete components or in a design involving a processor circuit operable to execute codes for directing the processor to carry out the functionality described above, for example.
- the functional blocks shown in FIG. 3 may be implemented by such codes, for example.
- Such codes may be pre-stored at the network element and run by a processor circuit 50 at the network element.
- the processor circuit 50 may be in communication with an interface (not shown) permitting such codes to be downloaded from a remote computer, or the processor circuit may have a media interface (not shown) for reading codes from a computer readable medium such as a CD-ROM, diskette or any other computer readable medium.
- the signal modifier can be implemented by discrete components or in a design involving a processor circuit operable to execute codes for directing the processor circuit to carry out the functionality described above, for example.
- a processor circuit may be the same processor circuit 50 as used for the detector 40 or may be a separate processor circuit.
- the processor circuit may be in communication with an interface (not shown) permitting such codes to be downloaded from a remote computer, or the processor circuit may have a media interface for reading codes from a computer readable medium such as a CD-ROM, diskette or any other computer readable medium.
- the network element advertised window Wne is calculated by the volume value generator 42 shown in FIG. 2 in response to conditions at the queue 20 through which the forward data packets pass from the transmitter to the receiver. Effectively, the network element advertised window size is estimated as a function of conditions including the mismatch between the forward data arrival volume and the target or desired forward data departure volume of the queue, upper and lower bound departure volumes, the target utilization factor, the actual service volume, the queue occupancy and the allocated buffer size, for example.
- the volume value generator 42 may be implemented in a design involving a processor circuit operable to execute codes for directing the processor to carry out the functionality of the volume value generator, for example. Such codes may be pre-stored at the network element 14 and run by a processor at the network element, including the processor circuit 50 , for example. It will be appreciated that the processor circuit may be in communication with an interface (not shown) permitting such codes to be downloaded from a remote computer, or the processor circuit may have a media interface for reading codes from a computer readable medium such as a CD-ROM, diskette or any other computer readable medium.
- sampling/control interval ⁇ t is at least equal to the maximum possible round trip time (RTT).
- RTT round trip time
- a suitable default RTT for a Wide Area Network (WAN) is 100 mSec.
- volume value generator 42 is described by way of a flowchart of an algorithm illustrating how a network element volume value is computed by the volume value generator.
- the flowchart shown may be considered to represent blocks of codes for directing a processor circuit to provide the functionality of the volume value generator.
- the use of the current arrival volume filter reduces the effect of sudden bursts of data such as those transmitted according to TCP, on the filtered arrival volume estimate.
- Blocks 82 to 88 direct the processor circuit 50 to act as a queue size control mechanism.
- Block 82 directs the processor circuit to obtain the current queue occupancy q(n) and the upper threshold Th from the queue interface 48 and block 84 directs the processor circuit to determine whether the current queue occupancy q(n) is greater than the upper threshold Th.
- the processor circuit is then directed to block 90 .
- block 88 directs the processor circuit to set the scaling factor f(n) equal to 1 and to proceed to block 90 .
- the algorithm may include block 90 which directs the processor circuit 50 to act as a volume limiter by setting the maximum departure volume T max equal to the maximum observed receiver volume value max Wrec, where the maximum observed receiver volume value is obtained from the signal modifier 44 shown in FIG. 2 .
- the calculated network element volume value Wne is then provided by the volume value generator 42 to the signal modifier 44 for use as described above in connection with the signal modifier 44 .
- the queue size control mechanism is triggered when the number of packets q(n) in the queue 20 exceeds a queue threshold Th.
- the target capacity T(n) i.e., the target number of bytes that can be transmitted by the transmitter 12 over the sampling period
- f(q(n)) the capacity (1 ⁇ f(q(n)))T(n) used to drain the queue.
- the queue size control mechanism is disabled and window size computation is determined based on the unscaled target capacity T(n).
- An example of the function f(q(n)) is:
- a discrete time representation of the control process for producing a new network element volume is shown generally at 200 .
- the apparatus 38 shown in FIG. 2 modifies the returning acknowledgements (e.g. ACKs) in a traffic class, regardless of the connections they belong to. That is, all connections in a traffic class (queue) are treated equally and receive the same feedback for the same network condition. This results in a simple control design and avoids the need to maintain the state of active TCP connections in the router. In the case of a connection not making use of its allocated window, there will be a mismatch (or error) between the arrival volume M(n) and the target departure volume T(n), causing an increase in the network element window Wne being signalled to all connections. This results in the active connections increasing their window sizes (thus their throughput), sharing the available bandwidth equally.
- ACKs acknowledgements
- the limit 0 ⁇ 2 is a theoretical stability bound. In practice, the ⁇ depends not only on the physical properties of the system itself but also on the environment in which the system must operate. The “best” value for a depends primarily on the characteristics of the system's noise, perturbations and process delays. In cases where these quantities are completely known, theoretically optional values of a can be determined. However, these quantities are usually unknown in practical systems such as IP networks.
- a queue size control mechanism is used in the algorithm to help regulate the queue occupancy level. This mechanism is triggered when the network queue operates at or beyond a knee of the delay-throughput curve (where the queue size can become large). The mechanism improves responsiveness (especially when many TCP connections enter or leave the system) and controls the queue length (thereby minimizing packet losses and network delays). The queue size control mechanism enhances the responsiveness and stability of the system and helps to quickly bring the system to the desired operating conditions.
- a benefit of the transmission volume adjustment scheme described herein is that the sum of the windows of the active connections sharing a buffer or queue in a network element such as a router is matched to the effective network bandwidth-delay product, thus avoiding packet losses whenever possible. This is achieved by explicitly controlling the data volume on the connections as a function of prevailing conditions in the network element.
- the data volume information is communicated by the router to the transmitters by modifying the advertised window field in the acknowledgements or ACKs flowing back to them.
- the proposed scheme does not require modifications to the TCP implementations in the end systems, and does not need to maintain per-flow state in the router.
- the scheme is able to provide high throughput, fairness, and low packet loss rates to the TCP connections.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
Description
The processor circuit is then directed to block 90. Alternatively, if at
Wne(n)=[Wne(n−1)+α{f(n)T(n)−M(n)}]T min T max, 0<α<1.
-
- when Th<q(n)≦B then f(n)=e−ξ(q(n)−Th)
- when q(n)−Th≦0 then f(n)=1
- where:
- ξ=a decay factor of the queue control function
- B=allocated buffer size
- q(n)=instantaneous queue size
- Th=queue threshold value
Wne(n+1)−(1−α)Wne(n)=−αε(n)+d(n)
which has the solution given by:
or
|1−α|<1,
or
0<α<2.
Claims (33)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/465,705 US6990070B1 (en) | 1999-12-17 | 1999-12-17 | Method and apparatus for adjusting packet transmission volume from a source |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/465,705 US6990070B1 (en) | 1999-12-17 | 1999-12-17 | Method and apparatus for adjusting packet transmission volume from a source |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US6990070B1 true US6990070B1 (en) | 2006-01-24 |
Family
ID=35614083
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/465,705 Expired - Fee Related US6990070B1 (en) | 1999-12-17 | 1999-12-17 | Method and apparatus for adjusting packet transmission volume from a source |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6990070B1 (en) |
Cited By (53)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030189951A1 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2003-10-09 | Qi Bi | Method and apparatus for system resource management in a communications system |
US20040024895A1 (en) * | 2000-05-25 | 2004-02-05 | Michel Henrion | Method for mutual transfers of control parameters through a communications network |
US20040125747A1 (en) * | 2002-12-27 | 2004-07-01 | Behrokh Samadi | Methods and apparatus for flow control based packet aggregation in a communication network |
US20040264489A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2004-12-30 | Klemets Anders E. | Streaming of variable bit rate multimedia content |
US20040268400A1 (en) * | 2003-06-26 | 2004-12-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Quick starting video content |
US20050063302A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2005-03-24 | Samuels Allen R. | Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control |
US20050117515A1 (en) * | 2003-11-28 | 2005-06-02 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Transmitter device for controlling data transmission |
US20050254420A1 (en) * | 2002-07-19 | 2005-11-17 | Stefan Wager | Method for calculating a transmission window size |
US20060015570A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-19 | Netscaler, Inc. | Method and device for performing integrated caching in a data communication network |
US20060029063A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-09 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | A method and systems for routing packets from a gateway to an endpoint |
US20060039354A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-23 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for client-side application-aware prioritization of network communications |
US20060168295A1 (en) * | 2003-06-27 | 2006-07-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Midstream Determination of Varying Bandwidth Availability |
US20060182115A1 (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2006-08-17 | Himanshu Shah | System for scheduling scans of interior nodes of a network domain for reachability events |
US20060195605A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-08-31 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP buffering |
US20060195660A1 (en) * | 2005-01-24 | 2006-08-31 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | System and method for performing entity tag and cache control of a dynamically generated object not identified as cacheable in a network |
US20060200849A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-09-07 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP pooling |
US20060215710A1 (en) * | 2005-03-25 | 2006-09-28 | Fujitsu Limited | Frame communication method and device |
US20060248581A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-11-02 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | Systems and methods for providing client-side dynamic redirection to bypass an intermediary |
US7162533B2 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2007-01-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Session description message extensions |
US7188172B2 (en) | 2000-08-09 | 2007-03-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Fast dynamic measurement of connection bandwidth using a pair of packets, a packet-pair bandwidth calculation and a list of recent bandwidth measurements |
US20070156966A1 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | System and method for performing granular invalidation of cached dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US7266613B1 (en) * | 2000-08-09 | 2007-09-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Fast dynamic measurement of bandwidth in a TCP network environment |
US20070206497A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2007-09-06 | Robert Plamondon | Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets |
US20070206621A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2007-09-06 | Robert Plamondon | Systems and methods of using packet boundaries for reduction in timeout prevention |
US20070206615A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2007-09-06 | Robert Plamondon | Systems and methods for stochastic-based quality of service |
US7299280B2 (en) * | 2001-10-17 | 2007-11-20 | The Regents Of University Of California | Method and apparatus for TCP with faster recovery |
US20080084826A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2008-04-10 | Ong Lyndon Y | Congestion Control for Signalling Transport Protocols |
WO2008049462A1 (en) * | 2006-10-26 | 2008-05-02 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | A method and receiver for controlling the conformance of a data flow in a communication system to a traffic definition |
US20080112345A1 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2008-05-15 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Systems and Methods of Improving Protocol Performance |
WO2008112692A2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2008-09-18 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of providing proxy-based quality of service |
WO2008119948A1 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-09 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Ad hoc communication system |
US7548948B2 (en) | 2002-06-24 | 2009-06-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Client-side caching of streaming media content |
US20090201828A1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2009-08-13 | Allen Samuels | Method of determining path maximum transmission unit |
US7650421B2 (en) | 2002-12-30 | 2010-01-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Adaptable accelerated content streaming |
US20100050040A1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2010-02-25 | Samuels Allen R | Tcp selection acknowledgements for communicating delivered and missing data packets |
US20100103819A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2010-04-29 | Samuels Allen R | Flow control system architecture |
US20100332594A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2010-12-30 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | Systems and methods for automatic installation and execution of a client-side acceleration program |
US20110145330A1 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2011-06-16 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | System and method for performing flash crowd caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US7983156B1 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2011-07-19 | Openwave Systems Inc. | System and method for controlling network congestion |
US20110231929A1 (en) * | 2003-11-11 | 2011-09-22 | Rao Goutham P | Systems and methods for providing a vpn solution |
US8233392B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2012-07-31 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Transaction boundary detection for reduction in timeout penalties |
US8255456B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2012-08-28 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing flash caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8259729B2 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2012-09-04 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgements |
US8261057B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2012-09-04 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for establishing a virtual private network |
US8495305B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2013-07-23 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and device for performing caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8549149B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2013-10-01 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP multiplexing |
US20130272276A1 (en) * | 2012-04-11 | 2013-10-17 | Olympus Corporation | Wireless communication device, memory device, wireless communication system, wireless communication method, and computer program product |
EP2728927A1 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2014-05-07 | NEC Corporation | Communication system and base station device |
US9985724B2 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2018-05-29 | Ciena Corporation | Horizontal synchronization extensions for service resizing in optical networks |
US10404698B1 (en) | 2016-01-15 | 2019-09-03 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Methods for adaptive organization of web application access points in webtops and devices thereof |
US20200259747A1 (en) * | 2017-10-27 | 2020-08-13 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Dynamic buffer management in multi-client token flow control routers |
US10834065B1 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2020-11-10 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Methods for SSL protected NTLM re-authentication and devices thereof |
CN119197652A (en) * | 2024-11-22 | 2024-12-27 | 南京诺丹工程技术有限公司 | A kind of adjustment device and method based on visual optimization |
Citations (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4769815A (en) | 1987-04-10 | 1988-09-06 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Packet flow control method |
US5541919A (en) | 1994-12-19 | 1996-07-30 | Motorola, Inc. | Multimedia multiplexing device and method using dynamic packet segmentation |
US5546389A (en) * | 1993-07-13 | 1996-08-13 | Alcatel N.V. | Method of controlling access to a buffer and a device for temporary storage of data packets and an exchange with such a device |
US5737313A (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 1998-04-07 | Nec Usa, Inc. | Design of a closed loop feed back control for ABR service |
US5748901A (en) * | 1996-05-21 | 1998-05-05 | Ramot University Authority Ltd. | Flow control algorithm for high speed networks |
US5781772A (en) | 1989-07-12 | 1998-07-14 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Compressed prefix matching database searching |
US5805585A (en) * | 1996-08-22 | 1998-09-08 | At&T Corp. | Method for providing high speed packet data services for a wireless system |
US6011795A (en) | 1997-03-20 | 2000-01-04 | Washington University | Method and apparatus for fast hierarchical address lookup using controlled expansion of prefixes |
US6018524A (en) | 1997-09-09 | 2000-01-25 | Washington University | Scalable high speed IP routing lookups |
US6067574A (en) | 1998-05-18 | 2000-05-23 | Lucent Technologies Inc | High speed routing using compressed tree process |
US6108307A (en) | 1997-12-12 | 2000-08-22 | Newbridge Networks Corporation | Frame relay priority queses to offer multiple service classes |
US6119235A (en) | 1997-05-27 | 2000-09-12 | Ukiah Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for quality of service management |
US6212184B1 (en) | 1998-07-15 | 2001-04-03 | Washington University | Fast scaleable methods and devices for layer four switching |
US6215769B1 (en) | 1998-10-07 | 2001-04-10 | Nokia Telecommunications, Inc. | Enhanced acknowledgment pacing device and method for TCP connections |
US6219713B1 (en) * | 1998-07-07 | 2001-04-17 | Nokia Telecommunications, Oy | Method and apparatus for adjustment of TCP sliding window with information about network conditions |
US6223172B1 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2001-04-24 | Nortel Networks Limited | Address routing using address-sensitive mask decimation scheme |
US6252851B1 (en) | 1997-03-27 | 2001-06-26 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method for regulating TCP flow over heterogeneous networks |
US6266706B1 (en) | 1997-09-15 | 2001-07-24 | Effnet Group Ab | Fast routing lookup system using complete prefix tree, bit vector, and pointers in a routing table for determining where to route IP datagrams |
US6324165B1 (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 2001-11-27 | Nec Usa, Inc. | Large capacity, multiclass core ATM switch architecture |
US6333917B1 (en) | 1998-08-19 | 2001-12-25 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for red (random early detection) and enhancements. |
US6424626B1 (en) | 1999-10-29 | 2002-07-23 | Hubbell Incorporated | Method and system for discarding and regenerating acknowledgment packets in ADSL communications |
US6463068B1 (en) | 1997-12-31 | 2002-10-08 | Cisco Technologies, Inc. | Router with class of service mapping |
US6490251B2 (en) | 1997-04-14 | 2002-12-03 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for communicating congestion information among different protocol layers between networks |
US6526055B1 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2003-02-25 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for longest prefix address lookup |
US6529477B1 (en) | 1999-02-02 | 2003-03-04 | Mentat Inc. | Internet over satellite system |
US6549517B1 (en) * | 1998-12-11 | 2003-04-15 | Nortel Networks Limited | Explicit rate computation for flow control in compute networks |
US6560610B1 (en) | 1999-08-10 | 2003-05-06 | Washington University | Data structure using a tree bitmap and method for rapid classification of data in a database |
US6614789B1 (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2003-09-02 | Nasser Yazdani | Method of and apparatus for matching strings of different lengths |
US6671258B1 (en) | 2000-02-01 | 2003-12-30 | Alcatel Canada Inc. | Dynamic buffering system having integrated random early detection |
-
1999
- 1999-12-17 US US09/465,705 patent/US6990070B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4769815A (en) | 1987-04-10 | 1988-09-06 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Packet flow control method |
US5781772A (en) | 1989-07-12 | 1998-07-14 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Compressed prefix matching database searching |
US5546389A (en) * | 1993-07-13 | 1996-08-13 | Alcatel N.V. | Method of controlling access to a buffer and a device for temporary storage of data packets and an exchange with such a device |
US5541919A (en) | 1994-12-19 | 1996-07-30 | Motorola, Inc. | Multimedia multiplexing device and method using dynamic packet segmentation |
US5737313A (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 1998-04-07 | Nec Usa, Inc. | Design of a closed loop feed back control for ABR service |
US5748901A (en) * | 1996-05-21 | 1998-05-05 | Ramot University Authority Ltd. | Flow control algorithm for high speed networks |
US5805585A (en) * | 1996-08-22 | 1998-09-08 | At&T Corp. | Method for providing high speed packet data services for a wireless system |
US6011795A (en) | 1997-03-20 | 2000-01-04 | Washington University | Method and apparatus for fast hierarchical address lookup using controlled expansion of prefixes |
US6252851B1 (en) | 1997-03-27 | 2001-06-26 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method for regulating TCP flow over heterogeneous networks |
US6490251B2 (en) | 1997-04-14 | 2002-12-03 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for communicating congestion information among different protocol layers between networks |
US6119235A (en) | 1997-05-27 | 2000-09-12 | Ukiah Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for quality of service management |
US6324165B1 (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 2001-11-27 | Nec Usa, Inc. | Large capacity, multiclass core ATM switch architecture |
US6018524A (en) | 1997-09-09 | 2000-01-25 | Washington University | Scalable high speed IP routing lookups |
US6266706B1 (en) | 1997-09-15 | 2001-07-24 | Effnet Group Ab | Fast routing lookup system using complete prefix tree, bit vector, and pointers in a routing table for determining where to route IP datagrams |
US6223172B1 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2001-04-24 | Nortel Networks Limited | Address routing using address-sensitive mask decimation scheme |
US6108307A (en) | 1997-12-12 | 2000-08-22 | Newbridge Networks Corporation | Frame relay priority queses to offer multiple service classes |
US6463068B1 (en) | 1997-12-31 | 2002-10-08 | Cisco Technologies, Inc. | Router with class of service mapping |
US6067574A (en) | 1998-05-18 | 2000-05-23 | Lucent Technologies Inc | High speed routing using compressed tree process |
US6219713B1 (en) * | 1998-07-07 | 2001-04-17 | Nokia Telecommunications, Oy | Method and apparatus for adjustment of TCP sliding window with information about network conditions |
US6212184B1 (en) | 1998-07-15 | 2001-04-03 | Washington University | Fast scaleable methods and devices for layer four switching |
US6333917B1 (en) | 1998-08-19 | 2001-12-25 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for red (random early detection) and enhancements. |
US6215769B1 (en) | 1998-10-07 | 2001-04-10 | Nokia Telecommunications, Inc. | Enhanced acknowledgment pacing device and method for TCP connections |
US6526055B1 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2003-02-25 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for longest prefix address lookup |
US6549517B1 (en) * | 1998-12-11 | 2003-04-15 | Nortel Networks Limited | Explicit rate computation for flow control in compute networks |
US6529477B1 (en) | 1999-02-02 | 2003-03-04 | Mentat Inc. | Internet over satellite system |
US6560610B1 (en) | 1999-08-10 | 2003-05-06 | Washington University | Data structure using a tree bitmap and method for rapid classification of data in a database |
US6424626B1 (en) | 1999-10-29 | 2002-07-23 | Hubbell Incorporated | Method and system for discarding and regenerating acknowledgment packets in ADSL communications |
US6614789B1 (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2003-09-02 | Nasser Yazdani | Method of and apparatus for matching strings of different lengths |
US6671258B1 (en) | 2000-02-01 | 2003-12-30 | Alcatel Canada Inc. | Dynamic buffering system having integrated random early detection |
Non-Patent Citations (49)
Title |
---|
"Traffic Management Specification Version 4.0", The ATM Forum, Apr. 1996. |
Astrom, K.; Hagglund T.; "PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning", Instrument Society of America, 1995, pp. v, 80-81. |
Braden, B.; Clark, D.; Crowcroft, J.; Davie, B.; Deering, S.; Estrin, D.; Floyd, S.; Jacobson, V.; Minshall, G.; Partiridge, C.; Peterson, L.; Ramakrishnan, K.; Shenker, S.; Wroclawski, J.; Zhang, L.; "Recommendations on Queue Management and Congestion Avoidance in the Internet", IETF RFC 2309, pp. 1-17, Apr. 1998. |
Carter, Larry; Floyd, Robert; Gill, John; Markowsky, George; Wegman, Mark; "Exact and Approximate Membership Testers", Proc. 10th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 59-65, May 1978. |
Degermark, Mikael; Brodnik, Andrej; Carlsson, Svante; Pink, Stephen; "Small Forwarding Tables for Fast Routing Lookups", Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, pp. 3-14, Sep. 1997. |
Demers, Alan; Keshav, Srinivasan; Shenker, Scott; "Analysis and Simulation of a Fair Queueing Algorithm", Internetworking: Research and Experience, vol. 1, pp. 1-12, 1989. |
Doeringer, Willibald; Karjoth, Gunter; Nassehi, Medhi; "Routing on Longest-Matching Prefixes", IEEE/ACM Trans. On Networking, vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 86-97, Feb. 1996. |
Eatherton, William N.; "ASIC Based IPV4 Lookups", Washington University, Applied Research Laboratory, pp. 1-22, Jun. 23, 1998. |
Eatherton, William N.; "Hardware-Based Internet Protocol Prefix Lookups", Thesis, Washington University, pp. 1-100, May 1999. |
Elz, R.; "A Compact Representation of IPv6 Addresses", Network Working Group, University of Melbourne, pp. 1-6, Apr. 1, 1996. |
Fall, Kevin; Floyd, Sally; "Simulation-based Comparisons of Tahoe, Reno, and SACK TCP", Computer Commun. Rev. Jul. 1996. |
Feng, Wu-Chang; Kandlur, Dilip D.; Saha, Debanjan; Shin, Kang G.; "Blue: A New Class of Active Queue Management Algorithms", U. Michigan CSE-TR-387-99, Apr. 1999. |
Feng, Wu-Chang; Kandlur, Dilip D.; Shah, Debanjan; Shin, Kang G.; "Techniques for Eliminating Packet Loss in Congested TCP/IP Networks", U. Michigan CSE-TR-349-97, Nov. 1997. |
Filippi, E.; Innocenti, V.; Vercellone, V.; "Address Lookup Solutions for Gigabit Switch/Router", Globecom '98, Sydney, Australia, Nov. 1998. |
Floyd, Sally; Jacobson, Van; "Link-Sharing and Resource Management Models for Packet Networks", IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 365-386, Aug. 1995. |
Floyd, Sally; Jacobson, Van; "Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance", IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 297-413, Aug. 1993. |
Fuller, V.; Li, T.; Yu, J.; Varadhan, K.; "Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): an Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy", RFC 1519, Internet Engineering Task Force, Sep. 1993. |
Ghani, Nasir, "Enhanced TCP/IP ACK Pacing for High Speed Networks", Proc. 16th Int'l Teletraffic Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, Jun., 1999. |
Gupta, Pankaj; Lin, Steven; McKeown, Nick; "Routing Lookups in Hardware at Memory Access Speeds", IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 1998. |
Jacobson, Van, Karels Michael J.; "Congestion Avoidance and Control", Proc. ACM SIGCOMM'88, pp. 314-329, Nov., 1988. |
Jacobson, Van; "Modified TCP Congestion Avoidance Algorithm", end2end-interest mailing list, Apr. 30, 1990. |
Jain, Raj; "A Comparison of Hashing Schemes for Address Lookup in Computer Networks"; pp. 1-17; Technical Report DEC-TR-593 Digital Equipment Corporation, Feb. 1989. |
Kalampoukas, Lampros; Varma, Anujan; Ramakrishnan, K.K.; "Explicit Window Adaptation: A Method to Enhance TCP Performance", UCSC-97-21, pp. 1-28, Aug. 1997. |
Karn, P.; "Dropping TCP acks", Mail to the end-to-end mailing list, Feb., 1996. |
Kioke, Arata; "TCP Flow control with ACR information", ATM Forum Contribution 97-0758R1, Nov., 1997. |
Kumar, Vijay P.; Lakshman, T.V.; Stiliadis, Dimitrios; Beyond Best Effort: Router Architectures for the Differentiated Services of Tomorrow's Internet, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 152-164, May 1998. |
Lampson, B.; Srinivasan, V.; Varghese, G.; "IP Lookups Using Multiway and Multicolumn Search", pp. 1-23, Aug. 1997. |
Ma, Jian; "Improving TCP Performance in IP networks with Wireless links", IEEE, ICPWC '99, Jaipur, India, pp. 211-215. |
Mathis, M.; Mahdavi, J.; Floyd, S.; Romanow, A.; "TCP Selective Acknowledgement Options", IETF RFC 2018, pp. 1-12, Oct. 1996. |
Mathis, Matthew; Mahdavi, Jamshid; "Forward Acknowledgement: Refining TCP Congestion Control", Proc. ACM SIGCOMM'96, Aug. 1996. |
McKenney, Paul E.; "High-Speed Event Counting and Classification Using a Dictionary Hash Technique"; pp. III-71-III-75; International Conference on Parallel Processing, 1989. |
Morrison, Donald R.; "Patricia-Practical Algorithm To Retrieve Information Coded in Alphanumeric", Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 514-534, vol. 15, No. 4, Oct. 1968. |
Narvaez, Paolo; Siu, Kai-Yeung; "Acknowledgement bucket scheme for regulating TCP flow over ATM", Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, IEEE Globecom '97, Phoenix, Arizona, Nov., 1997 pp. 1775-1791. |
Narvaez, Paolo; SIU, Kai-Yeung; "An Acknowledgement Bucket Scheme for Regulating TCP Flow over ATM", IEEE Globecom '97, Phoenix, Arizona, Nov., 1997. |
Nilsson, Stefan; Karlsson, Gunnar; "Fast Address Lookup for Internet Routers", IFIP Workshop on Broadband Communications, pp. 10-22, Apr. 1998. |
Ott, Teunis J.; Lakshman, T.V.; Wong, Larry H.; "SRED: Stabilized RED", INFOCOMM '99, Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies Proceedings, IEEE, Jun. 1999, vol. 3, pp. 1346-1355. |
Partridge, C.; "ACK Spacing for High Delay-Bandwidth Paths with Insufficient Buffering", IETF Internet Draft, pp. 1-4, Sep. 1998. |
Pei, Tong Bi; Zukowksi, Charles; "Putting Routing Tables in Silicon", IEEE Network Magazine, pp. 42-50, Jan. 1982. |
Ramakrishna, M.V.; Fu, E.; Bahcekapili, E.; "Efficient Hardware Hashing Functions for High Performance Computers", pp. 1378-1381; IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 46, No. 12, Dec. 1997. |
Rijsinghani, A.; "Computation of the Internet Checksum via Incremental Update", IETF RFC 1624, pp. 1-6, May 1994. |
Satyavolu, Ramakrishna; Duvedi, Ketan; Kalyanaraman, Shivkumar; "Explicit Rate Control of TCP Applications", ATM Forum Document Number: ATM Forum/98-0152R1, pp. 1-20, Feb. 1998. |
Srinivasan, V.; Varghese, G.; "Fast Address Lookups Using Controlled Prefix Expansion", ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1-40, Feb. 1999. |
Srinivasan, V.; Varghese, G.; "Faster IP Lookups using Controlled Prefix Expansion", ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, pp. 1-10, Jun. 1998. |
Stevens, W.; Memo (IETF RFC 2001): "TCP Slow Start, Congestion Avoidance, Fast Retransmit, and Fast Recovery Algorithms", Jan., 1997. |
Tzeng, Henry Hong-Yi; "Longest Prefix Search Using Compressed Trees", Globecom '98, Sydney, Australia, Nov. 1998. |
Tzeng, Henry Hong-Yi; Przygienda, Tony; "On Fast Address-Lookup Algorithms"; pp. 1067-1082, IEEE Journal On Selected Areas In Communications, vol. 17, No. 6, Jun. 1999. |
Waldvogel, Marcel; Varghese, George; Turner, Jon; Plattner, Bernhard; "Scalable High Speed IP Routing Lookups", Proc. Of ACM SIGCOM, Sep. 1997. |
Ziegler, T.; Clausen, H.D.; Congestion Avoidance with BUC (Buffer Utilization Control) Gateways and RFCN (Reverse Feedback Congestion Notification). |
Zitterbart, M.; Harbaum, T.; Meier, D.; Brokelmann, D.; "HeaRT: High Performance Routing Table Look Up", IEEE Workshop Architecture & Implementation of High Performance Communications Subsystems, Thessaloniki, Greece, Jun. 1997. |
Cited By (122)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7290062B2 (en) * | 2000-05-25 | 2007-10-30 | Alcatel | Method for mutual transfers of control parameters through a communications network |
US20040024895A1 (en) * | 2000-05-25 | 2004-02-05 | Michel Henrion | Method for mutual transfers of control parameters through a communications network |
US7353286B2 (en) | 2000-08-09 | 2008-04-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Fast dynamic measurement of bandwidth in a TCP network environment |
US7349977B2 (en) * | 2000-08-09 | 2008-03-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Fast dynamic measurement of bandwidth in a TCP network environment |
US7266613B1 (en) * | 2000-08-09 | 2007-09-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Fast dynamic measurement of bandwidth in a TCP network environment |
US7188172B2 (en) | 2000-08-09 | 2007-03-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Fast dynamic measurement of connection bandwidth using a pair of packets, a packet-pair bandwidth calculation and a list of recent bandwidth measurements |
US20080084826A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2008-04-10 | Ong Lyndon Y | Congestion Control for Signalling Transport Protocols |
US7876678B2 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2011-01-25 | Ciena Corporation | Congestion control for signalling transport protocols |
US7299280B2 (en) * | 2001-10-17 | 2007-11-20 | The Regents Of University Of California | Method and apparatus for TCP with faster recovery |
US20030189951A1 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2003-10-09 | Qi Bi | Method and apparatus for system resource management in a communications system |
US7558196B2 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2009-07-07 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Method and apparatus for system resource management in a communications system |
US7725557B2 (en) | 2002-06-24 | 2010-05-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Client-side caching of streaming media content |
US7548948B2 (en) | 2002-06-24 | 2009-06-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Client-side caching of streaming media content |
US20050254420A1 (en) * | 2002-07-19 | 2005-11-17 | Stefan Wager | Method for calculating a transmission window size |
US9496991B2 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2016-11-15 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of using packet boundaries for reduction in timeout prevention |
US8259729B2 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2012-09-04 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgements |
US7969876B2 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2011-06-28 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method of determining path maximum transmission unit |
US8553699B2 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2013-10-08 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgements |
US9008100B2 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2015-04-14 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgments |
US8411560B2 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2013-04-02 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | TCP selection acknowledgements for communicating delivered and missing data packets |
US20100050040A1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2010-02-25 | Samuels Allen R | Tcp selection acknowledgements for communicating delivered and missing data packets |
US20090201828A1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2009-08-13 | Allen Samuels | Method of determining path maximum transmission unit |
US7336607B2 (en) * | 2002-12-27 | 2008-02-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Methods and apparatus for flow control based packet aggregation in a communication network |
US20040125747A1 (en) * | 2002-12-27 | 2004-07-01 | Behrokh Samadi | Methods and apparatus for flow control based packet aggregation in a communication network |
US7650421B2 (en) | 2002-12-30 | 2010-01-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Adaptable accelerated content streaming |
US20040268400A1 (en) * | 2003-06-26 | 2004-12-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Quick starting video content |
US7634373B2 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2009-12-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Midstream determination of varying bandwidth availability |
US20060168295A1 (en) * | 2003-06-27 | 2006-07-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Midstream Determination of Varying Bandwidth Availability |
US7391717B2 (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2008-06-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Streaming of variable bit rate multimedia content |
US20040264489A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2004-12-30 | Klemets Anders E. | Streaming of variable bit rate multimedia content |
US20070206621A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2007-09-06 | Robert Plamondon | Systems and methods of using packet boundaries for reduction in timeout prevention |
US8238241B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2012-08-07 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control |
US8462630B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2013-06-11 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Early generation of acknowledgements for flow control |
US20070206497A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2007-09-06 | Robert Plamondon | Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets |
US8824490B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2014-09-02 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control |
US8432800B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2013-04-30 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for stochastic-based quality of service |
US20050063302A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2005-03-24 | Samuels Allen R. | Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control |
US8437284B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2013-05-07 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets |
US20100103819A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2010-04-29 | Samuels Allen R | Flow control system architecture |
US20070206615A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2007-09-06 | Robert Plamondon | Systems and methods for stochastic-based quality of service |
US9071543B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2015-06-30 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets |
US8270423B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2012-09-18 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of using packet boundaries for reduction in timeout prevention |
US8233392B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2012-07-31 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Transaction boundary detection for reduction in timeout penalties |
US20100232294A1 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2010-09-16 | Samuels Allen R | Early generation of acknowledgements for flow control |
US8310928B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2012-11-13 | Samuels Allen R | Flow control system architecture |
US20110231929A1 (en) * | 2003-11-11 | 2011-09-22 | Rao Goutham P | Systems and methods for providing a vpn solution |
US8559449B2 (en) | 2003-11-11 | 2013-10-15 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a VPN solution |
US20050117515A1 (en) * | 2003-11-28 | 2005-06-02 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Transmitter device for controlling data transmission |
US7764616B2 (en) * | 2003-11-28 | 2010-07-27 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Transmitter device for controlling data transmission |
US7783772B2 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2010-08-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Session description message extensions |
US7809851B2 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2010-10-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Session description message extensions |
US7162533B2 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2007-01-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Session description message extensions |
US8726006B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2014-05-13 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for establishing a virtual private network |
US8739274B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2014-05-27 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and device for performing integrated caching in a data communication network |
US20060015570A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-19 | Netscaler, Inc. | Method and device for performing integrated caching in a data communication network |
US8261057B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2012-09-04 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for establishing a virtual private network |
US8495305B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2013-07-23 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and device for performing caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8914522B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2014-12-16 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for facilitating a peer to peer route via a gateway |
US20060039356A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-23 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for facilitating a peer to peer route via a gateway |
US8634420B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2014-01-21 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for communicating a lossy protocol via a lossless protocol |
US20100325299A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2010-12-23 | Rao Goutham P | Systems and Methods for Communicating a Lossy Protocol Via a Lossless Protocol Using False Acknowledgements |
US8892778B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2014-11-18 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and systems for securing remote access to private networks |
US8897299B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2014-11-25 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and systems for routing packets from a gateway to an endpoint |
US7808906B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2010-10-05 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for communicating a lossy protocol via a lossless protocol using false acknowledgements |
US8363650B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2013-01-29 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and systems for routing packets from a gateway to an endpoint |
US9219579B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2015-12-22 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for client-side application-aware prioritization of network communications |
US20100232429A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2010-09-16 | Rao Goutham P | Systems and methods for communicating a lossy protocol via a lossless protocol |
US8014421B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2011-09-06 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for adjusting the maximum transmission unit by an intermediary device |
US20060190719A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-08-24 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for communicating a lossy protocol via a lossless protocol using false acknowledgements |
US8351333B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2013-01-08 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for communicating a lossy protocol via a lossless protocol using false acknowledgements |
US8291119B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2012-10-16 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and systems for securing remote access to private networks |
US20060039354A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-23 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for client-side application-aware prioritization of network communications |
US20060037071A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-16 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | A method and systems for securing remote access to private networks |
US20060029063A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-09 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | A method and systems for routing packets from a gateway to an endpoint |
US8509067B2 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2013-08-13 | Unwired Planet, Inc. | System and method for controlling network congestion |
US7983156B1 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2011-07-19 | Openwave Systems Inc. | System and method for controlling network congestion |
US20100332594A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2010-12-30 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | Systems and methods for automatic installation and execution of a client-side acceleration program |
US8954595B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2015-02-10 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP buffering |
US8706877B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2014-04-22 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side dynamic redirection to bypass an intermediary |
US20060195605A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-08-31 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP buffering |
US8549149B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2013-10-01 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP multiplexing |
US8700695B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2014-04-15 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP pooling |
US8856777B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2014-10-07 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic installation and execution of a client-side acceleration program |
US20060248581A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-11-02 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | Systems and methods for providing client-side dynamic redirection to bypass an intermediary |
US20060200849A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-09-07 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP pooling |
US20060195660A1 (en) * | 2005-01-24 | 2006-08-31 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | System and method for performing entity tag and cache control of a dynamically generated object not identified as cacheable in a network |
US7849270B2 (en) | 2005-01-24 | 2010-12-07 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing entity tag and cache control of a dynamically generated object not identified as cacheable in a network |
US7849269B2 (en) | 2005-01-24 | 2010-12-07 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing entity tag and cache control of a dynamically generated object not identified as cacheable in a network |
US8848710B2 (en) | 2005-01-24 | 2014-09-30 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing flash caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8788581B2 (en) | 2005-01-24 | 2014-07-22 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and device for performing caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US7969907B2 (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2011-06-28 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System for scheduling scans of interior nodes of a network domain for reachability events |
US20060182115A1 (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2006-08-17 | Himanshu Shah | System for scheduling scans of interior nodes of a network domain for reachability events |
US20060215710A1 (en) * | 2005-03-25 | 2006-09-28 | Fujitsu Limited | Frame communication method and device |
US8499057B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2013-07-30 | Citrix Systems, Inc | System and method for performing flash crowd caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8255456B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2012-08-28 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing flash caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US20070156966A1 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | System and method for performing granular invalidation of cached dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8301839B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2012-10-30 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing granular invalidation of cached dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US20110145330A1 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2011-06-16 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | System and method for performing flash crowd caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
WO2008049462A1 (en) * | 2006-10-26 | 2008-05-02 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | A method and receiver for controlling the conformance of a data flow in a communication system to a traffic definition |
US8477608B2 (en) | 2006-10-26 | 2013-07-02 | Unwired Planet, Llc | Method and receiver for controlling the conformance of a data flow in a communication system to a traffic definition |
US20100046374A1 (en) * | 2006-10-26 | 2010-02-25 | Reiner Ludwig | Method and receiver for controlling the conformance of a data flow in a communication system to a traffic definition |
US20080112345A1 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2008-05-15 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Systems and Methods of Improving Protocol Performance |
US8542618B2 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2013-09-24 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Systems and methods of improving protocol performance |
WO2008112692A2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2008-09-18 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of providing proxy-based quality of service |
US8184534B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2012-05-22 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of providing proxy-based quality of service |
WO2008112692A3 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2008-11-27 | Citrix Systems Inc | Systems and methods of providing proxy-based quality of service |
US7706266B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2010-04-27 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of providing proxy-based quality of service |
US20080225715A1 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2008-09-18 | Robert Plamondon | Systems and methods of providing proxy-based quality of service |
US8462691B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2013-06-11 | British Telecommunications Plc | Ad hoc communication system |
WO2008119948A1 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-09 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Ad hoc communication system |
US20100128653A1 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2010-05-27 | British Telecommunications Pulbic Limited | Ad hoc communication system |
US9609545B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2017-03-28 | Nec Corporation | Communication system and base station device |
EP2728927A1 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2014-05-07 | NEC Corporation | Communication system and base station device |
EP2728927A4 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2015-02-18 | Nec Corp | Communication system and base station device |
US9332563B2 (en) * | 2012-04-11 | 2016-05-03 | Olympus Corporation | Wireless communication device, memory device, wireless communication system, wireless communication method, and computer program product |
US20130272276A1 (en) * | 2012-04-11 | 2013-10-17 | Olympus Corporation | Wireless communication device, memory device, wireless communication system, wireless communication method, and computer program product |
US10834065B1 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2020-11-10 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Methods for SSL protected NTLM re-authentication and devices thereof |
US10404698B1 (en) | 2016-01-15 | 2019-09-03 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Methods for adaptive organization of web application access points in webtops and devices thereof |
US9985724B2 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2018-05-29 | Ciena Corporation | Horizontal synchronization extensions for service resizing in optical networks |
US20200259747A1 (en) * | 2017-10-27 | 2020-08-13 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Dynamic buffer management in multi-client token flow control routers |
US12284116B2 (en) * | 2017-10-27 | 2025-04-22 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Dynamic buffer management in multi-client token flow control routers |
CN119197652A (en) * | 2024-11-22 | 2024-12-27 | 南京诺丹工程技术有限公司 | A kind of adjustment device and method based on visual optimization |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6990070B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for adjusting packet transmission volume from a source | |
US6894974B1 (en) | Method, apparatus, media, and signals for controlling packet transmission rate from a packet source | |
US7047312B1 (en) | TCP rate control with adaptive thresholds | |
Parsa et al. | Improving TCP congestion control over internets with heterogeneous transmission media | |
US6690645B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for active queue management based on desired queue occupancy | |
US7974195B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for network congestion control | |
US7136353B2 (en) | Quality of service management for multiple connections within a network communication system | |
US8125910B2 (en) | Communication system | |
US7352700B2 (en) | Methods and devices for maximizing the throughput of TCP/IP data along wireless links | |
US20110002236A1 (en) | Optimization of streaming data throughput in unreliable networks | |
US7656800B2 (en) | Transmission control protocol (TCP) | |
US8917599B2 (en) | Systems and methods for controlling data transmission rates | |
CN113613286A (en) | Space-ground integrated intelligent network multi-path congestion control method | |
US8416694B2 (en) | Network feedback method and device | |
US8743693B2 (en) | Method for dynamically adjusting token bucket sizes | |
CN106789702B (en) | Method and device for controlling transmission performance of TCP (Transmission control protocol) | |
Aweya et al. | Enhancing TCP performance with a load‐adaptive RED mechanism | |
US7197009B1 (en) | Delay variation based routing in communication systems | |
Jacobsson et al. | Some modeling and estimation issues in control of heterogeneous networks | |
Raniwala et al. | Evaluation of a stateful transport protocol for multi-channel wireless mesh networks | |
Awadallah et al. | TCP-BFA: Buffer fill avoidance | |
Ho et al. | An enhanced slow-start mechanism for TCP Vegas | |
Ayesta et al. | Multilevel approach for modeling short TCP sessions | |
Aweya et al. | An adaptive buffer management mechanism for improving TCP behavior under heavy load | |
Möller | Automatic control in TCP over wireless |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION, CANADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AWEYA, JAMES;MONTUNO, DLIFIN Y.;OUELLETTE, MICHEL;REEL/FRAME:010497/0691 Effective date: 19991216 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION, CANADA Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 2ND ASSIGNOR'S NAME, PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 010497 FRAME 0691;ASSIGNORS:AWEYA, JAMES;MONTUNO, DELFIN Y.;OUELLETTE, MICHEL;REEL/FRAME:011076/0708 Effective date: 19991216 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED, CANADA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:011195/0706 Effective date: 20000830 Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED,CANADA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:011195/0706 Effective date: 20000830 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ROCKSTAR BIDCO, LP, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:027164/0356 Effective date: 20110729 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ROCKSTAR BIDCO, LP;REEL/FRAME:032399/0442 Effective date: 20120509 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP;ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM LLC;BOCKSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:034924/0779 Effective date: 20150128 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, IL Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:RPX CORPORATION;RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC;REEL/FRAME:038041/0001 Effective date: 20160226 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.) |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RPX CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE (REEL 038041 / FRAME 0001);ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044970/0030 Effective date: 20171222 Owner name: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE (REEL 038041 / FRAME 0001);ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044970/0030 Effective date: 20171222 |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.) |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20180124 |